For many hotels, Booking.com and Expedia are both a blessing and a problem. How do you rely less on platforms without carelessly giving up visibility? It's not about platform criticism, but the distribution logic behind it.
For many hotels, Booking.com and Expedia are both a blessing and a problem. Hardly any professionally run property would deny that these platforms generate real demand in many markets. They provide visibility, reach, and a steady flow of guests. That is exactly why platforms have become a fixed part of distribution for many hotels. And that is exactly why this topic is so sensitive.
Because what creates reach in the short term can reduce control in the long term. The more a hotel gets used to generating a meaningful share of its business through Booking.com and Expedia, the more the center of gravity in distribution shifts out of its own system. The central strategic question: How does a hotel move out of this imbalance without simply losing demand? What does real control actually mean?
Many hotels see platforms mainly as a cost issue and conclude that they simply need to reduce OTA share. In practice, that view is too narrow. Less Booking.com and Expedia does not automatically mean more control if the hotel's own channel remains weak.
Commission is only the most visible part of the issue. Through strong platform dependency, a hotel often loses influence on perception, data ownership, and the guest relationship. Control is not only a financial issue but a matter of steerability: Who determines how demand is won and converted into bookings?
Platform dependency usually does not arise as a clear strategy but as a gradual development. Platforms bring reach and close gaps – what helps in the short term becomes an operational habit. When the direct channel is neglected too long, platforms grow into those gaps.
A high OTA share is often the symptom, not the root cause. The hotel is not primarily losing to Booking or Expedia, but to the path that feels more convenient or secure from the guest's perspective. The more important question: Where is our own channel still too weak?
Any hotel that wants to reduce platforms before its own direct channel is resilient enough does not automatically gain more control. Often a gap appears. Control only comes when the hotel's own system is strong enough to reliably carry the same performance on its own.
The larger lever often lies not in generating new demand but in better processing existing demand. Many hotels are already being found – the weakness lies in the fact that the direct channel does not consistently convert this attention into bookings.
The website is not just a showroom but the central instrument through which a hotel can win back more control over its distribution. If less Booking.com and Expedia is to lead to more control, the website must function as an active sales system.
A guest chooses the direct path when it feels like the better option from their perspective. A truly effective direct booking advantage changes the logic of the decision. It does not have to be price – transparency, flexibility, or a more trustworthy process can be economically stronger.
Platforms offer not only reach but standardized security. The direct channel must show the guest that they do not have less but ideally more clarity and control here. This happens through the combination of many signals – from conditions and design to the booking engine.
On the smartphone, it is often decided whether a hotel gains control or hands demand back to platforms. Mobile users are faster and less tolerant of friction. Strengthening the mobile experience prevents existing demand from being unnecessarily given back to third party channels.
Bringing existing guests back directly is often economically stronger than new customer acquisition. When CRM, post-stay communication, and repeat guest incentives are properly built, it becomes much easier to make direct revenue from existing relationships.
More control does not come primarily from making an external channel weaker. It comes from managing the hotel's own system better. Website, mobile, booking, CRM, and visibility must work together so that the direct path becomes more convincing.
First strengthen the foundation: positioning, website as sales system, direct booking advantage, trust, mobile strength, booking flow, repeat guests. Only when this base is solid, change the distribution mix more deliberately and reduce platform dominance.
Less Booking.com and Expedia is only a win when the strength of the hotel's own distribution actually increases. That happens through a stronger direct channel – website, direct booking advantage, trust, mobile strength, repeat guests. Then not only does platform share fall. The hotel's real sales power rises.
The difference lies between a hotel that complains about platforms and a hotel that actively wins its distribution back.
Does less Booking.com and Expedia automatically mean more control?
Not automatically. Less platform share leads to more control only when the hotel's own direct channel is strong enough to absorb the displaced demand.
Why are many hotels too dependent on OTAs despite strong occupancy?
Because strong occupancy does not mean the hotel's own distribution is strong. Many properties achieve volume through platforms while their website and direct channel remain underdeveloped.
What is the most important first step for more control?
Honestly evaluate the performance of the existing direct channel. Most relevant: positioning, website clarity, direct booking advantage, trust, mobile performance.
Is a better price on the hotel website enough?
Usually not. More control comes when the direct path as a whole becomes clearer, more trustworthy, and more relevant.
Where is the fastest potential?
Often in brand aware demand and repeat guests. Interest is already high there – with a stronger direct channel, many bookings can be profitably shifted into the hotel's own system.
For many hotels, OTA share is a double-edged issue. How can OTA share be reduced without simply losing bookings? The key is not pulling back from platforms, but strengthening the hotel's own direct channel.
Read MoreReduce OTA dependencyFor many hotels, OTA distribution is both essential and uncomfortable. Platforms bring reach—but when do they start skimming margin instead of delivering genuine value? The economic logic behind it.
Read MoreReduce OTA dependencyFor many hotels, OTAs are both a growth driver and a source of dependency. How can you become less dependent on platforms without losing bookings? Five concrete, economically sensible paths.
Read More